Update

We are currently experiencing a bit of difficulty with providing timely translations for some of the texts. So as to be a bit more regular we will, for the time being, be providing posts without translations.

Advertisements
Posted in Updates | Leave a comment

Feria V

Missa de Spiritu Sancto

Introit (alternative, in feriis autem V post Dominicas Septuagesimae et Sexagesimae): Ez 36:23-26; V./ Ps 33:2
Tract: Ps 116:1-2
Alleluia (TP): Ps 32:6

Missa de dulcissimo Nomine Jesu*

Introit: V./ Ps 134:3
Collect:

Deus, qui gloriosissimum Nomen Jesu Christi, unigeniti Filii tui Domini nostri, fecisti fidelibus tuis sanctissimae suavitatis affectu amabile, et malignis spiritibus tremendum atque terribile: concede propitius; ut omnes qui Nomen Jesu devote venerantur in terris, sanctae consolationis dulcedinem in praesenti percipiant, et in futuro gaudium exsultationis et interminabilis beatitudinis obtineant in caelis. Per Dominum.

O God, who hast made the most glorious Name of Jesus Christ, thine only-begotten Son, Our Lord lovable and most sweet to thy faithful and dreadful and terrible to wicked spirits: graciously grant; that all who devoutly venerate the Name of Jesus on earth, may presently feel the sweetness of holy consolation, and in the future obtain the joy of exaltation and unending blessedness in heaven. Through our Lord.

Gradual: Eph 1:20-22; V./ Ps 87 78:9;
Alleluia:

Dulce Nomen Domini nostri, Jesu Christi, melos auri, mel in esu: cordis verum jubilum fugat mundi sibilum.

Sweet Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, melody to the ear, as eating honey: true song of the heart which drives out the din of the world.

Tract: Eccl. jubilatio

Dulce Nomen Jesu Christi omnen auferens tristitiam, jucundas mentem jubilo. Tollit luctum, affert fructum, et obductum et seductum purgat cor a nubilo. Nos defendit, nos accendit, nos intendit, et extendit Nomen hoc gaudium.

Gospel: Mt 1:20-23
Offertory: Mk 16:17-18
Secret:

In veneratione Nominis dilecti Filii tui, Domini nostri Jesu Christi, tibi, Deus, Pater misericordiarum, devotis mentibus, hostias immolamus: suppliciter, deprecantes; ut, earum virtute, cunctis gentibus, praestetur auxilium, et, in eodem Nomine delectantes, salutarem sui propositi consequantur effectum. Per eumdem Dominum.

Communion: Apoc 2:17
Post-Communion:

Sacrosancta mysteria, quae sumpsimus, Domine, in honorem Nominis complacentissimi Filii tui, Domine nostri Jesu Christi, devotis praecordiis recolentes: quaesumus; ut incrementa nobis spiritualis exsultationis accumulent, et affectum nostrum ad hoc salutiferum Nomen Jesu nobis imprimendum accendant, et ad jubilandum in Jesu, Salutari nostro dulcissimo, tota mentis attentione promoveant. Per eumdem Dominum.


* This Mass is different than that of the feast Sanctissimi Nominis Jesu, which is the same both in the Bragan and Roman books.

Posted in Missae Votivae | Leave a comment

In Expectatione Partus B. Mariae Virg.

Today’s feast (18/12) is a very old feast in the Iberian peninsula; it is still commemorated in the cathedral of Evora in the novus ordo, but doesn’t seem to be celebrated elsewhere in Portugal. The Bragan missal, however, does keep the feast.
The Mass is identical to that of the Annunciation apart from the following differences:

Introit: Isa 45:8; V./ Ps 18:2
Alleluia: Lk 1:31
Preface: of the Blessed Virgin with the inclusion of “et te in Expectatione

16847

Our Lady of the O

While not present in the ’62 edition, one can find this Mass in earlier editions, in the section for aliquibus in locis celebrandae.

Posted in Proprium de Tempore | Tagged | 1 Comment

History of the use/rite of Braga (III)

The 16th century was witness to the beginning of bi-ritualism in the archdiocese. We begin to see Roman elements creeping into the Bragan use (e.g., saints from the Roman calendar, the Bragan calendar being very sparse at the time; rules for the Gloria and Credo). At this time the desire for a change of rite in order to conform to the Roman praxis was considered laudable. The archbishop Diogo de Sousa (1505-1532) supplied the cathedral with more liturgical manuscripts and ordered more editions to be printed. At the same time, he ordered more Roman books to be printed, though we are unaware of his motivation. The fables concerning St. Pedro de Rates first appear in the breviaries of 1511 and 1528. The rubrics of the 1512 missal indicated that the Paschal Vigil should be celebrated at night (missa in nocte dicatur). In 1521 the archbishop directed Fr. Xystus Figueira to write a guide for clergy on how to recite the Office according to Bragan custom. In 1538 a liturgical oddity happened: the printing of the Rituale (12/7) was shortly followed by that of the missal (16/7); however, the ordo found in the first book was that of the diocese of Coimbra!

230px-d-_frei_baltasar_limpo_-_galeria_dos_arcebispos_de_braga

Baltazar Limpo, OC

Baltazar Limpo, OC (1550-1558) introduced a number of innovations into the missal:

  • fixed the prayers at the foot of the altar and added the Ave Maria;
  • the praeparatio calcis was permitted to be done either at the beginning of Mass or before or after the Gospel;
  • prayers at the Offertory;
  • added preparatory prayers for the priest’s communion;
  • for the laity’s preparation for communion, added the possibility of the Confiteor being said in Portuguese;
  • Sub tuum praesidium at the end of Mass [Dr. Carvalho says that it was the Salve Regina; however the latter cannot be found among the Marian antiphons recited at the end of  Mass];
  • structure of ancient rites suffered significant alterations

While the missal was printed in Lyon and the archbishop was a Carmelite, no direct dependencies from the Carmelite or Lyonnaisse missals can be detected in that of Braga. There are shared bits, but they can also be found in other French books (be they local uses or those of religious orders). There does seem to be a direct dependency with another missal, however: a recent study by Dr. Joaquim Felix de Carvalho has discovered that Baltazar’s missal relies heavily upon the missal of Salamanca (1533). Already at a diocesan synod in 1537 the clergy were permitted to pray the Roman Office when extra chorum; however, choirs and cathedral, collegiate churches and religious houses were not to take advantage of this privilege without the superior obtaining the consent of the majority. Not reciting the Bragan Office (in the case of not having been granted such a privilege) could result in excommunication. The 1558 edition of the Bragan missal already saw an attempt to make it similar to the Roman; this edition would be the last one before 1924. In 1594 a diocesan synod reaffirmed the obligation of praying the Divine Office according the the Bragan breviary under pain of excommunication; churches were to conform to the use of the primatial church, and if only one Mass was to be said then it must necessarily be according to the Bragan rite.

In 1600 the primate approved statutes of the cathedral chapter, prescribing all Hours and Offices to be according to the Bragan use. The introduction of the Roman breviary was proposed during the episcopate of Rodrigo da Cunha (1626-1634); however, the cathedral canons opposed the measure, citing archbishop Bartolomeu, who had assisted at the Council of Trent and was in favour of maintaining the liturgical customs of Braga. In the end, a reform of the breviary resulted in the:

  • introduction of Roman hymns;
  • revision of biblical texts, according to the Vulgata approved at Trent;
  • elimination of homilies by Origin and some attributed to St. Augustine;
  • obligatory character of the Canticum Canticorum extra chorum being removed;

D. Gueranger, one of the founding members of the original Liturgical Movement in the 19th century, said of the 1634 Bragan breviary that it was “essentially the Roman breviary, but with some particularities”. It should be noted that Rodrigo was in favour of introducing the Roman rite, but faced serious opposition from the canons. The chapel of the Misericordia of Braga was authorized the use of the Roman breviary (1629), in spite of the founder having required that only the Bragan be used. A manual for the administration of the Sacraments was approved in 1637, having been printed in 1697.

800px-rodrigo_moura_telles

Rodrigo de Moura Teles

Rodrigo de Moura Teles (archbishop from 1704-1728) asked the Apostolic See to be dispensed from reciting the Bragan breviary. His request was approved; however, he eventually opted in favour of the Bragan. In spite of his declaration of favouring the local use, he ended up being buried with Roman ceremonial. As a side note, he instituted lausperene in 1709, a practice which is still maintained to this day all throughout Lent. Gaspar de Braganca (1758-1789) tried to adopt the Roman rite, and even went so far as to reform the cathedral chant by bringing in friars to teach Roman chant in the seminary and primatial church. The chapter approved the introduction of Roman chant and new feasts, but vigorously opposed the change of rites. The canons agreed that the cerimonials of 1558 were to be retained even if they were not found in earlier missals. A Benedictine, Fr. Jose de San Miguel, was brought in to help clear up the cathedral’s liturgical issues and history. While he reached some strange conclusions about the Bragan use’s origin (going so far as to claim that it came from the Benedictines of Tibaes!), he was of the opinion that the Congregation of Rites should be consulted before introducing any changes, and should the archbishop persist on attempting to introduce the Roman rite, then the Crown should be approached! The chapter of April 7th, 1780 discussed the question of suppressing the Marian tropes in the Gloria, but decided in favour of retaining them. Nonetheless, in spite of the insistence of maintaining Braga’s liturgical heritage, solemn funeral ceremonies continued to be celebrated in the primatial church with recourse to the Roman rite without any protest from the canons.

From 1876 to 1883 a practical school of the Roman rite was established in the seminary, and the authorities intended to modify the breviary without informing Rome. This lead to an enormous backlash from laity and clergy, much like what had taken place in Lyon only 20 years prior under similar circumstances, resulting in the archdiocese being flooded with pamphlets and newspaper articles defending the liturgical patrimony.

13466401_10154466502035695_8958239133935104482_n

A new perpetual calendar was approved for the archdiocese by the Congregation of Rites in 1906. In 1907 the primatial church was granted privileges of a minor basilica, including the adoption of the following insignia: the pavilhao (a kind of large yellow and purple striped umbrella) and the campanario (a staff with an elaborately carved top enclosing a bell, which was preceded by the mace bearer). The Congregation of Rites approved in 1908 the basis suggested for reform of the Bragan rite. Pope Benedict XV’s bull, Sedis hujus Apostolicae (1919), approved the reform of the breviary. This reform preserved the original structure of the rite (the distribution of the Psalms followed Divina Afflatu), suppressed any lessons unhistorical or contrary to the proved tradition of the Church, and clergy were reminded of the obligatory nature of the breviary. A solemn thanksgiving for the restoration of the traditional liturgy was celebrated at the cathedral on the feast of the Immaculate Conception in 1919. A mandate from the archbishop was issued November 5th 1923, directing clergy to recite the reformed breviary and ceremonies of high Mass according to the local use from January 1st 1924. The new edition of the missal was approved by Pope Pius XI in 1924, on the feast of the Immaculate Conception. While it is believed that this reform was a return to a “purer” form of the Bragan tradition, it was based on the missal of D. Baltazar, perhaps oblivious to the amount of innovations introduced at the time.

imageedit_4_4230894234

Campanario, with pavilhão in the background

We have already discussed here the attempts at reform of the use in the aftermath of the promulgation of the Novus Ordo Missae. It has recently come to our attention that some form of alterations were approved in the mid-to-late 1970’s. These changes will be addressed sometime in the future, once enough information has been gathered.

Posted in History | Leave a comment

History of the use/rite of Braga (II)

espac3b1a1037

Kingdoms of Leon and Castile (1037)

The definitive restoration of the diocese of Braga did not take place before the mid-12th century. Bishop Pedro was chosen for the diocese in 1070, but in 1088 the bishop of Lugo still retained the title of metropolitan (with the invasion of the Iberian peninsula by the Moors in 711, Lugo assumed prominence after Braga fell). At the Council of Burgos (1080) the Mozarabic rite was abrogated, resulting in the adoption of the Roman rite in the kingdoms of Leon and Castile (it is possible that Braga and Coimbra were the last “refuge” of the Mozarabic rite during the reign of Alfonso VI). The establishment of the Roman rite in the Iberian peninsula was largely the work of Cluny, resulting in many Cluniac and French features being adopted into the liturgy.

cluny

Artist’s rendition of Cluny Abbey

Bishop Pedro adopted the Roman rite for the cathedral of Braga, which was consecrated in 1089 by the Cluniac archbishop of Toledo, Bernard de la Sauvetat. Urban II conferred the title of “Primate of Hispania” on the archbishop of Toledo in spite of Braga having a more ancient tradition and being restored before Toledo (the issue of the title would rear its head several times throughout the centuries – once with Pope Honorius III ordering perpetual silence on the matter! –  finally being resolved at Trent).

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Feria IV

There are a number of votive Masses for the Apostles and Evangelists in the Bragan missal which are a bit of a mishmash of the individual Masses of said saints in the Roman. It is not our aim at this time to point out which parts can be found in which Roman Masses, therefore we shall limit ourselves to identifying the Bragan Masses.
—————————-

Missa de uno S. Apostolo extra tempus paschale

Introit: Ps 138:17; V./ Ps 138:1-2
Collect: Majestatem tuam, Domine
Epistle: Eph 2:19-22
Gradual: Ps 44:17-18
Alleluia: Jn 15:19.16
Tract: Ps 20:3-4
Gospel: Jn 15:12-16
Offertory: Ps 18:5
Secret: Sacrificium nostrum tibi, Domine
Communion: Mt 19:28
Post-communion: Sumpsimus, Domine, divina mysteria

 

Missa de omnibus Ss. Apostolis extra tempus paschale

Introit: 2 Esdr 9:27; V./ Ps 32:1
Collect: Deus, qui nos per beatos
Epistle: Rm 8:28-39
Gradual: Ps 138:17-18
Alleluia: Lk 22:28.27
Tract: Ps 125:5-6
Gospel: Mt 10:5-15
Offertory: 44:17-18
Secret: Gloriam, Domine, sanctorum Apostolorum
Communion: Mt 19:28-29
Post-communion: Perceptis, Domine, sacramentis, suppliciter exoramus

 

Missa de Ss. Evangelistis extra tempus paschale

Introit: Eccl 15:5
Collect: Deus, qui beatos Evangelistias
Epistle: Ez 1:10-14
Gradual: Ps 138:17-18
Alleluia: Is 41:27
Tract: Ps 20:3-4
Gospel: Lk 10:1-9
Offertory: Ps 18:5
Secret: Beatorum Evangelistarum veneratione tibi
Communion: Mt 25:40.34
Post-communion: Tribuant nobis, quaesumus, Domine

 

Missa de uno S. Apostolo tempore paschali

Same as outside of Paschal-tide except for:
Introit: Ps 63:3; V./Ps 63:2
Alleluia: Mt 28:2; Jn 15:16
After Offertory and Communion a double Alleluia is to be added.

 

Missa de omnibus Ss. Apostolis tempore paschali

Same as outside of Paschal-tide except for:
Triple alleluia to be added at Introit
Alleluia: Sap 5:1; Ps 88:6
After Offertory and Communion a double Alleluia is to be added.

 

Missa de Ss. Evangelistis tempore paschali

Same as outside of Paschal-tide except for:
Introit: Ps 63:3; V./Ps 63:2
Alleluia: Is 41:27; Ps 88:6
After Offertory and Communion a double Alleluia is to be added.

————————————

The rubrics allow on this day as well conventual Masses for: the patron saint of a town, a city, the archdiocese, the province, of Portugal, the titular of the church, or the founder of the religious order.

Posted in Missae Votivae | Tagged | Leave a comment

History of the use/rite of Braga (I)

After several years of existence we have finally gotten around to writing a summary of the history of the use of Braga. While the Schola de Sainte Cecile’s blog gives a decent outline of the rite’s history, it is in French and, thus, might not be readily accessible to non-francophones. It is also our intent to fill in the gaps of the aforementioned blog’s entry. This topic will take up several posts; once concluded it will all be located in a new blog page.
We culled two main sources for information: Liturgies of the Primatial Sees (King, Archdale); Pontifical de Luxo Bracaro-Romano (Carvalho, Joaquim Felix de). We are indebted to Andrew Klusman and Robert Nugent for making these resources readily available.

———————————————–

gallaecia-dioclecianus

Province of Gallaecia

Braga, formerly known as Bracara Augusta in Roman times, was one of the three juridical divisions of Gallaecia, having been divided by Augustus. There is a tradition of 7 bishops sent by the Apostles Sts. Peter and Paul to evangelize Hispania, having introduced Mass as the Apostles would have celebrated. Saint Cyprian mentions, in 254, a bishop of Astorga, a town of lesser importance than Braga, so it is probable that Braga would have already have had a bishop at this time. The first historical evidence we have concerning the existence of the diocese is in 397, during I Council of Toledo. Saint Peter of Rates is the legendary first bishop of Braga; however, no printed mention of him exists prior to 1511. The first bishop with historical certainty is Paternus, who assisted at the aforementioned council in the year 400.

paterno_ii_-_galeria_dos_arcebispos_de_braga

(St.???) Paternus

The Iberian peninsula was rife with heresy in the first centuries, most notably Arianism, Originism and Priscillianism. The Priscillianist heresy was of a Gnostic-Manichean origin, and by the 5th century the province of Gallaecia was aflame with it, bringing Braga into the spotlight. Priscillianism persisted from the 4th century up until the second half of the sixth. Bishop Paternus and four other bishops renounced the error at the Council of Toledo; the only bishop that had remained faithful to the Catholic faith was, at that time, in exile. Originism was introduced during the Suevic period.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment